Did you know that the predictive validity of traditional General Mental Ability (GMA) tests only scratches the surface of a candidate’s potential? While they’re great at measuring cognitive ability, they often miss the bigger picture—Behavioral Insights, Cultural Fit, and Retention Predictors.

Here’s a game-changer: Studies reveal that PMaps Assessments outperform GMA tests in predicting workforce success. But how does this impact your hiring strategy? What does this mean for your organization’s ROI and retention rates?

Let the numbers speak:

• GMA tests offer a predictive validity of 0.51 to 0.63—good, but not great.
• PMaps Assessments? Up to 0.87! That’s a leap in accuracy you can’t afford to ignore.

Imagine the impact of a hiring tool that not only evaluates cognitive ability but also gives you insights into retention likelihood, job satisfaction, and cultural alignment. 

GMA Tests Misses a Holistic Picture: Would you still settle for less?

• Retention insights: Can your assessments predict who will stay longer? Maybe.
• Behavioral understanding: Are you identifying the "why" behind candidate actions? No!
• Cultural fitment: Are you aligning hires with your organization’s values? Definitely not!

GMA tests weren’t built for this level of depth—but PMaps is.

Your hiring strategy deserves an upgrade. Here is why leading employers choose PMaps over traditional methods. Our comparative report lays it all out for you:

• The science behind our superior predictive validity.
• How PMaps integrates seamlessly into your hiring process.
• Real-world ROI and retention improvements backed by data.

Don’t Just Take Our Word for It

See the proof for yourself. Employers who switched to PMaps have reported up to 25% lower attrition rates and a significant boost in workforce satisfaction. Want to know more? Download the comparative report and find out how PMaps is redefining talent assessments across industries.